Indian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery

REVIEW ARTICLE
Year
: 2022  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 341--348

Comparing endovascular revascularization to open surgical revascularization for chronic mesenteric ischemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis


Saeed Saad Alqahtani1, Bader Menwer N Albilasi2, Osama Mohammed Alenzi3, Saleh Abdullah S Almoallem3, Ali Nuwaysir S Alruwaili3, Mohammed Hamoud Alkhaldi3, Abdullah Mohammad G Alruwaili3, Mohammed Amid S Alkhaldi3, Raid Jawdat Almassaeed2 
1 Vascular Surgery Division, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
2 Department of General Surgery, Alqurayyat General Hospital, Al Qurayyat, Saudi Arabia
3 Department of Surgery, Medical College of Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Saeed Saad Alqahtani
Vascular Surgery Division, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh
Saudi Arabia

Although the incidence of chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) is uncommon, it could become life threatening. With improvements in diagnostic imaging and endovascular therapy over the past few decades, the treatment of CMI has evolved. Even though endovascular revascularization for CMI is prominent, it is unclear if the early advantages outweigh the long-term patency rates. This study conducts a systematic review and meta-analysis to present comprehensive insights into the validity of endovascular revascularization versus open revascularization as effective therapeutic modalities. Studies up to 2022 were searched in MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, and Embase. Additionally, references from earlier studies and review papers were manually searched for additional relevant reports. At least two authors examined all the results, making sure they fit the inclusion and exclusion criteria. In the event of disagreement, the authors were able to reach an understanding. Open revascularization is superior to endovascular approaches in maintaining vessel patency and reducing symptoms over the long term. Perioperative problems are more common in patients undergoing open procedures. Each patient's anatomy and physiology call for a different revascularization approach to be applied in treating this condition.


How to cite this article:
Alqahtani SS, Albilasi BM, Alenzi OM, Almoallem SA, Alruwaili AN, Alkhaldi MH, Alruwaili AM, Alkhaldi MA, Almassaeed RJ. Comparing endovascular revascularization to open surgical revascularization for chronic mesenteric ischemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Indian J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2022;9:341-348


How to cite this URL:
Alqahtani SS, Albilasi BM, Alenzi OM, Almoallem SA, Alruwaili AN, Alkhaldi MH, Alruwaili AM, Alkhaldi MA, Almassaeed RJ. Comparing endovascular revascularization to open surgical revascularization for chronic mesenteric ischemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian J Vasc Endovasc Surg [serial online] 2022 [cited 2023 Feb 6 ];9:341-348
Available from: https://www.indjvascsurg.org/article.asp?issn=0972-0820;year=2022;volume=9;issue=5;spage=341;epage=348;aulast=Alqahtani;type=0